WORLD PEACE – John Smallman

World Peace.

Peace NowFebruary 10, 2015 by John Smallman

Dear All,

There is talk of WORLD PEACE being achieved by Valentine’s Day. I don’t know how many of you are open to this kind of prognostication, so if you find it unsettling, not “your cup of tea” forgive me for sending it to you.

Arch Angel Michael, through the channel Linda Dillon, talked about this today, which you can listen  to on the link below (it runs about 1 hour) and includes a guided meditation.

I think World Peace is long overdue, I AM hopeful that it can be achieved because each one of us, each human, if we CHOOSE, holds and extends an enormous energy field that can be directed to powerfully influence the hearts of those engaged in internal war with themselves that they then project outwards to partners, children, parents, church leaders, governmental leaders etc.

Peace IS possible if we become peaceful ourselves by intent, and we have unlimited help from those in the spiritual realms once we make that choice. That intent then flows across the planet as part of the “Tsunami of Love” powerfully influencing world leaders, war lords, and all individuals employed in the military and security forces across our world.

Remember that five months into World War I, the Christmas spirit took hold in the most unlikely of places—the bloody Western Front. In a series of spontaneous ceasefires, soldiers laid down their arms to sing carols, exchange gifts and even play soccer with the enemy. With today’s world a very different place to the one that existed in 1914, BECAUSE we have evolved spiritually, our collective intention that world peace occur by St.Valentine’s Day is powerful enough to make it happen.

There is only NOW, let’s do it!

Love and hugs to all John.

http://inlightuniversal.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/hb/hb021015.mp3

Advertisements

2014 – IT IS TIME TO MAKE A FIRM DECISION! NO MORE FENCE SITTING!

2014

IT IS TIME TO MAKE A FIRM DECISION

NO MORE FENCE SITTING!

decision-making2

IT IS TIME we all make a firm choice:  Do I want to continue living with myriad forms of separation:  nations, ideologies, races……… OR do I choose to rise above separation and learn to live as ONE FAMILY OF GOD?  Our planet is at a crossroads requiring that we make this decision NOW.

******A PLANETARY PORTAL OPENS WITH SPRING EQUINOX, MARCH 2014, THAT CAN TRIGGER MANY VERY POSITIVE CHANGES … BUT WE MUST CHOOSE & ACT UPON OUR DECISION!******

We can continue to cling to old political and religious ideologies, strive to bring back the way life use to be, maintain loyalty to one nation and engage in competition to be the most powerful … and by doing so, slow down the movement forward to New Earth … World Peace … Abundance for all … becoming One Planetary Family.

Sitting on the fence is no longer possible … “wait and see what happens” is not an option.  With our choices at this moment, we create our immediate future and our long term future.

Which Path are you willing to utterly dedicate your life to following?   ARE YOU WILLING TO MAKE THE NECESSARY CHANGES IN THOUGHT & BEHAVIOR PATTERNS REQUIRED TO WALK THE PATH TO BECOMING ONE WITH ALL THAT IS?

MAY WE ALL JOIN HANDS & TOGETHER, WALK ONTO OUR NEW EARTH!

artworks-000050621882-diol3n-t500x500https://pathwaytoascension.wordpress.com/2013/11/01/universal-love-paul-luftenegger-songwriter-singer/

LOVING ALL NATIONS/RACES IS LOVING YOUR ETERNAL SELF & THE ROADWAY TO WORLD PEACE!

LOVING ALL NATIONS/RACES IS LOVING YOUR ETERNAL SELF & THE ROADWAY TO WORLD PEACE!

Nancy B. Detweiler

With Uriel, Twin Flame

World-Map-1

I recently realized just how separated Earth humans really are. We can say “we love the planet” … but can we say “we love all nations on the planet”? Living on the plane of duality for thousands of years has taught us to like some nations (our allies) and to hate other nations (our enemies). It is like racial prejudice … we have grown up being taught that some races are better than other races.

What we have not been taught is that each one of us has incarnated into numerous racial groups and nations. I, for example, know that my Eternal Self has incarnated on Earth as an Egyptian, a Russian, an American Indian, an Essene during the time of Jesus, and an American (on the frontier and in the present).  As a elementary school child, I pondered the pictures of Baghdad in my geography book and feel that if I could go there, I would know my way around.  I know that my home planet is Venus.

We all come from the Stars to experience lifetimes on Earth. When we are taught by Earth societies to hate this or that nation/race and consider them “enemy,” we are actually being taught to hate a portion of our own eternal Self.

From personal experience, I have found that it is impossible to research (get to know) a nation/people and not feel love for that nation/people. During the years of using the Astrological Soul Map (natal chart interpreted esoterically) as a professional counseling tool, it is IMPOSSIBLE to avoid loving the individual because what I could see was the Soul.

In creating the pictorial documents on the beauty of nations and their people–Iran and Afghanistan–I felt Love the entire time of my research because I could see the Soul of that nation and its people. What I had been taught to believe about that nation/people fell by the wayside. (These pictorial documents may be seen at:

IRAN/PERSIA, Part 1&2:  https://pathwaytoascension.wordpress.com/2012/10/07/getting-to-know-the-beauty-of-iran-its-people/

AFGHANISTAN, Part 1&2:  https://pathwaytoascension.wordpress.com/2012/10/15/getting-to-know-the-beauty-of-afghanistan-its-people-part-1/

RUSSIA:  https://pathwaytoascension.wordpress.com/2014/10/06/getting-to-know-the-beauty-of-russia-its-people-a-pictorialprose-document/

IRAQ:  I very much wanted to create a pictorial document on Iraq; however the only photos I could find were of the utter destruction of this country and the suffering of its people.

GOOD NEWS REGARDING IRAQ as of 8/28/14:

“Iraq will become a world leader, as it rises to reclaim its place as part of the cradle of civilization which goes back 13,000 years. The ancestral memories remain in that part of the world, the deep spiritual connection which once guided the development of art, music, literature and science, the beacon which was intended to lead the human race out of darkness. That promise will be fulfilled at last, as the power of the cabal is defeated.”  “Seeds of Peace” – https://www.facebook.com/pages/Healing-For-Ascension-Tour/631766556869814)

Within the New Age/Lightworker community, we are repeatedly told to focus on the positive. What if we don’t know the positive about a nation or a people? I know, from my years as a professional counselor, that the majority of people know all about what is negative about themselves and next to nothing about what is positive.

I, for one, think it is imperative that we Lightworkers take the time to get to know the nations/people of Planet Earth.

Knowing the beauty within each nation/race = loving each nation/race.

LOVING EACH NATION/RACE = WORLD PEACE!

LET’S MAKE THIS WORLD A BETTER PLACE THROUGH MUSIC

LET’S MAKE THIS WORLD A BETTER PLACE

 THROUGH

MUSIC

 music

http://www.japanesestreets.com/reports/640/100-love-and-peace

The dark cabal in on its way out … yet rather than leave quietly, they are pulling out all the stops in an effort to create World War III. All wars are manipulated and based on lies.

 Let us pay the cabal and their propaganda no attention … the only food they have is our fear. We do not have enemies … what we have is people being paid to create trouble. Let us turn our back on war!

 Our Galactic Family, in accordance with Divine Decree, has said there will be no WWIII … no more nuclear weapons detonated. Any attempts will be neutralized by our Galactic Family.

 With the internet, people all over the world can sing together. Let us listen and sing with the world!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVHOqrw3Jks

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddLd0QRf7Vg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIzddbBW8n0

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NKcenS80eWo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J-t2ouOLYYw

THE CHOICE IS CLEAR … LOVE OR WAR!

THE CHOICE IS CLEAR!

DO WE WANT TO COME TOGETHER AS ONE

 

PWeCanHaveWorldPeacehttp://youthvoices.net/discussion/world-peace-0

AND LOVE ONE ANOTHER?

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=4xjPODksI08

 

OR

 DO WE WANT TO KILL, KILL, KILL? ship.si

 boeing-laser-525

  http://rt.com/usa/us-laser-weapon-persian-gulf-530/

 IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO COME TOGETHER IN UNITY

 &

 LIFT A WEAPON TO KILL!

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V1bFr2SWP1I

worldatpeacelg http://www.maddaboutcoffee.com/responsibility.php

   THERE WILL BE NO GUNS ON THE 5TH DIMENSION!

CREATING WORLD PEACE FOR OUR NEW EARTH – VALUABLE INFORMATION WE ALL NEED TO KNOW?

CREATING WORLD PEACE FOR OUR NEW EARTH

VALUABLE INFORMATION, INCLUDING THE FAREWELL SPEECH OF

PRESIDENT DWIGHT EISENHOWER

Earth ascending

WHY OBAMA PICKED HAGEL

Bob Woodward, Washington Post – January 28, 2013

http://tinyurl.com/b8dn938

 obama-hagel-pentagon-008-300x180

NOTE BY NANCY:  [As Earth moves through the 4th dimension toward 5th dimension, all negativity and suffering is to fall away.  Could Obama’s choice of Chuck Hagel as Secretary of Defense be a major step toward creating World Peace?] 

********************

In the first months of the Obama presidency in 2009, Chuck Hagel, who had just finished two terms as a U.S. senator, went to the White House to visit with the friend he had made during the four years they overlapped in the Senate.

So, President Obama asked, what do you think about foreign policy and defense issues?

According to an account that Hagel later gave, and is reported here for the first time, he told Obama: “We are at a time where there is a new world order. We don’t control it. You must question everything, every assumption, everything they” — the military and diplomats — “tell you. Any assumption 10 years old is out of date. You need to question our role. You need to question the military. You need to question what are we using the military for.

“Afghanistan will be defining for your presidency in the first term,” Hagel also said, according to his own account, “perhaps even for a second term.” The key was not to get “bogged down.”

Obama did not say much but listened.

At the time, Hagel considered Obama a “loner,” inclined to keep a distance and his own counsel. But Hagel’s comments help explain why Obama nominated his former Senate colleague to be his next secretary of defense. The two share similar views and philosophies as the Obama administration attempts to define the role of the United States in the transition to a post-superpower world.

This worldview is part hawk and part dove. It amounts, in part, to a challenge to the wars of President George W. Bush. It holds that the Afghanistan war has been mismanaged and the Iraq war unnecessary. War is an option, but very much a last resort.

So, this thinking goes, the U.S. role in the world must be carefully scaled back — this is not a matter of choice but of facing reality; the military needs to be treated with deep skepticism; lots of strategic military and foreign policy thinking is out of date; and quagmires like Afghanistan should be avoided.

NOTE BY NANCY:  [See President Eisenhower’s speech on the Industrial Military Complex at the end of this article.  He warned of the changes taking place that brought war to the forefront as the supposed means of solving the world’s problems.]

The bottom line: The United States must get out of these massive land wars — Iraq and Afghanistan — and, if possible, avoid future large-scale war.

Although much discussion of the Hagel nomination has centered on his attitudes about Iran, Israel and the defense budget, Hagel’s broader agreement with Obama on overall philosophy is probably more consequential.

Hagel has also said he believes it is important that a defense secretary should not dictate foreign policy and that policy should be made in the White House.

He privately voiced reservations about Obama’s decision in late 2009 to add 51,000 troops to Afghanistan. “The president has not had commander-in-chief control of the Pentagon since Bush senior was president,” Hagel said privately in 2011.

NOTE BY NANCY:  [This fact that the President no longer controls the actions of the Pentagon is extremely important.  Americans who do not know this often end up supporting the very people who are attempting to institute the New World Order and their own enslavement.]

If Hagel is confirmed, as appears likely, he and the president will have a large task in navigating this new world order. Avoiding war is tied directly to the credibility of the threat to go to war.

NOTE BY NANCY:  [The New World Order of the Dark Cabal continues to attempt to start World War III and to use nuclear weapons.  The Dark Cabal’s New World Order is to purposefully reduce the world’s population by killing billions so they can more easily control and enslave Earth’s inhabitants.]

Hagel’s experience provides two unusual perspectives. The first is as a former E-5 Army sergeant in 1968, which he has described as “the worst year of the Vietnam War.” In summation, another Vietnam must be avoided.

The second is the Georgetown University class that he taught called “Redefining Geopolitical Relationships.” He asks the class the basic question: Where is all this going?

For example, he has said that one result of the Iraq war has been to make Iran the most important country in the Middle East, and he worried that Iraq could become an Iranian satellite.

When I interviewed President Obama in the summer of 2010 for my book “Obama’s Wars,” his deeply rooted aversion to war was evident. As I reported in the book, I handed Obama a copy of a quotation from Rick Atkinson’s World War II history, “The Day of Battle,” and asked him to read it. Obama stood and read:

“And then there was the saddest lesson, to be learned again and again . . . that war is corrupting, that it corrodes the soul and tarnishes the spirit, that even the excellent and the superior can be defiled, and that no heart would remain unstained.”

“I sympathize with this view,” Obama told me. “See my Nobel Prize acceptance speech.”

I had listened to the speech when he gave it, Dec. 10, 2009, and later read it, but I dug it out again. And there it was:

“The instruments of war do have a role to play in preserving the peace. And yet this truth must coexist with another — that no matter how justified, war promises human tragedy. The soldier’s courage and sacrifice is full of glory, expressing devotion to country, to cause, to comrades in arms. But war itself is never glorious” — Churchill had called it that — “and we must never trumpet it as such. So part of our challenge is reconciling these two seemingly irreconcilable truths — that war is sometimes necessary and war at some level is an expression of human folly.”

That is probably the best definition of the Obama doctrine on war. Applying such a doctrine in today’s dangerous and unpredictable world will be daunting — but on these issues Obama seems to have found a soul mate.

[BOLD FONT BY NANCY]

Bob Woodward is an associate editor of The Post. His latest book is “The Price of Politics.” Evelyn M. Duffy contributed to this column.

***************************

QUOTING STEPHEN COOK – GOLDEN AGE OF GAIA.COM:

The above column  has led to other media picking up this story, too. This one below from Business Insider thanks to Lance.

****************************

Hagel Warned Obama Of Rogue Pentagon Leading A ‘New World Order’

Robert Johnson and Geoffrey Ingersoll, AP, Business Insider – January 28, 2013

As Chuck Hagel seeks support for his nomination to become Secretary of Defense, Bob Woodward has released a story about a White House trip the former Senator made in 2009.

The Washington Post reports:

According to an account that Hagel later gave, and is reported here for the first time, he told Obama: “We are at a time where there is a new world order.

“We don’t control it. You must question everything, every assumption, everything they” — the military and diplomats — “tell you. Any assumption 10 years old is out of date. You need to question our role. You need to question the military. You need to question what are we using the military for.”

Hagel warned the president about getting “bogged down” in Afghanistan and voiced concern over the deployment of 51,000 additional troops sent at the time to fight in the war.

The Post reports Hagel went so far as to say privately in 2011: “The president has not had commander-in-chief control of the Pentagon since Bush senior was president.”

Hagel is likely referring to Donald Rumsfeld’s battle for control of the military, both against generals and the president. The perception was that Bush was less the decider, and more a person to be advised of decisions already made.

NOTE BY NANCY:  Actually, Bush senior is a major leader of the dark cabal in America.]

Obama encountered his lack of control early in his first term. His stated intent was to draw down forces in Afghanistan. Later, through a controlled leak, Gen. Stanley McCrystal, then-commander of the International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan, grudgingly leveraged 30,000 troops out of a stubborn Obama administration.

Some would call that normal politics, but again the perception is that the commander in chief is not really in charge of the military.

The common word on the street nowadays is that the U.S. needs to de-escalate its overseas military obligations, focusing more on a lighter “footprint” approach to global counterinsurgency. The assessment falls in line with the president’s Defense Secretary nomination.

It looks like Hagel’s nomination could be approved and if so, he and the president could share deeply common views.

NOTE BY NANCY:  [DEEPLY COMMON VIEWS THAT ARE NEEDED IN ORDER TO CREATE WORLD PEACE, A PREREQUISITE FOR EARTH’S ASCENSION TO THE 5TH DIMENSION OF LIGHT, LOVE, PEACE, AND ABUNDANCE FOR ALL.]

[BOLD FONT BY NANCY]

***********************


Military-Industrial Complex Speech, Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1961


Public Papers of the Presidents, Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1960, p. 1035- 1040

NOTE BY NANCY:  President Eisenhower was a former military general and a Republican.

Eisenhower 2

My fellow Americans:

Three days from now, after half a century in the service of our country, I shall lay down the responsibilities of office as, in traditional and solemn ceremony, the authority of the Presidency is vested in my successor.

This evening I come to you with a message of leave-taking and farewell, and to share a few final thoughts with you, my countrymen.

Like every other citizen, I wish the new President, and all who will labor with him, Godspeed. I pray that the coming years will be blessed with peace and prosperity for all.

Our people expect their President and the Congress to find essential agreement on issues of great moment, the wise resolution of which will better shape the future of the Nation.

My own relations with the Congress, which began on a remote and tenuous basis when, long ago, a member of the Senate appointed me to West Point, have since ranged to the intimate during the war and immediate post-war period, and, finally, to the mutually interdependent during these past eight years.

In this final relationship, the Congress and the Administration have, on most vital issues, cooperated well, to serve the national good rather than mere partisanship, and so have assured that the business of the Nation should go forward. So, my official relationship with the Congress ends in a feeling, on my part, of gratitude that we have been able to do so much together.

II.

We now stand ten years past the midpoint of a century that has witnessed four major wars among great nations. Three of these involved our own country. Despite these holocausts America is today the strongest, the most influential and most productive nation in the world. Understandably proud of this pre-eminence, we yet realize that America’s leadership and prestige depend, not merely upon our unmatched material progress, riches and military strength, but on how we use our power in the interests of world peace and human betterment.

III.

Throughout America’s adventure in free government, our basic purposes have been to keep the peace; to foster progress in human achievement, and to enhance liberty, dignity and integrity among people and among nations. To strive for less would be unworthy of a free and religious people. Any failure traceable to arrogance, or our lack of comprehension or readiness to sacrifice would inflict upon us grievous hurt both at home and abroad.

Progress toward these noble goals is persistently threatened by the conflict now engulfing the world. It commands our whole attention, absorbs our very beings. We face a hostile ideology — global in scope, atheistic in character, ruthless in purpose, and insidious in method. Unhappily the danger it poses promises to be of indefinite duration. To meet it successfully, there is called for, not so much the emotional and transitory sacrifices of crisis, but rather those which enable us to carry forward steadily, surely, and without complaint the burdens of a prolonged and complex struggle — with liberty the stake. Only thus shall we remain, despite every provocation, on our charted course toward permanent peace and human betterment.

Crises there will continue to be. In meeting them, whether foreign or domestic, great or small, there is a recurring temptation to feel that some spectacular and costly action could become the miraculous solution to all current difficulties. A huge increase in newer elements of our defense; development of unrealistic programs to cure every ill in agriculture; a dramatic expansion in basic and applied research — these and many other possibilities, each possibly promising in itself, may be suggested as the only way to the road we wish to travel.

But each proposal must be weighed in the light of a broader consideration: the need to maintain balance in and among national programs — balance between the private and the public economy, balance between cost and hoped for advantage — balance between the clearly necessary and the comfortably desirable; balance between our essential requirements as a nation and the duties imposed by the nation upon the individual; balance between actions of the moment and the national welfare of the future. Good judgment seeks balance and progress; lack of it eventually finds imbalance and frustration.

The record of many decades stands as proof that our people and their government have, in the main, understood these truths and have responded to them well, in the face of stress and threat. But threats, new in kind or degree, constantly arise. I mention two only.

IV.

A vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment. Our arms must be mighty, ready for instant action, so that no potential aggressor may be tempted to risk his own destruction.

Our military organization today bears little relation to that known by any of my predecessors in peacetime, or indeed by the fighting men of World War II or Korea.

Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United States corporations.

This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence — economic, political, even spiritual — is felt in every city, every State house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.

In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the militaryindustrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.

We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.

Akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture, has been the technological revolution during recent decades.

In this revolution, research has become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.

Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been overshadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers.

The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present

  • and is gravely to be regarded.

Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientifictechnological elite.

It is the task of statesmanship to mold, to balance, and to integrate these and other forces, new and old, within the principles of our democratic system — ever aiming toward the supreme goals of our free society.

V.

Another factor in maintaining balance involves the element of time. As we peer into society’s future, we — you and I, and our government — must avoid the impulse to live only for today, plundering, for our own ease and convenience, the precious resources of tomorrow. We cannot mortgage the material assets of our grandchildren without risking the loss also of their political and spiritual heritage. We want democracy to survive for all generations to come, not to become the insolvent phantom of tomorrow.

VI.

Down the long lane of the history yet to be written America knows that this world of ours, ever growing smaller, must avoid becoming a community of dreadful fear and hate, and be instead, a proud confederation of mutual trust and respect.

Such a confederation must be one of equals. The weakest must come to the conference table with the same confidence as do we, protected as we are by our moral, economic, and military strength. That table, though scarred by many past frustrations, cannot be abandoned for the certain agony of the battlefield.

Disarmament, with mutual honor and confidence, is a continuing imperative. Together we must learn how to compose differences, not with arms, but with intellect and decent purpose. Because this need is so sharp and apparent I confess that I lay down my official responsibilities in this field with a definite sense of disappointment. As one who has witnessed the horror and the lingering sadness of war — as one who knows that another war could utterly destroy this civilization which has been so slowly and painfully built over thousands of years — I wish I could say tonight that a lasting peace is in sight.

Happily, I can say that war has been avoided. Steady progress toward our ultimate goal has been made. But, so much remains to be done. As a private citizen, I shall never cease to do what little I can to help the world advance along that road.

VII.

So — in this my last good night to you as your President — I thank you for the many opportunities you have given me for public service in war and peace. I trust that in that service you find some things worthy; as for the rest of it, I know you will find ways to improve performance in the future.

You and I — my fellow citizens — need to be strong in our faith that all nations, under God, will reach the goal of peace with justice. May we be ever unswerving in devotion to principle, confident but humble with power, diligent in pursuit of the Nation’s great goals.

To all the peoples of the world, I once more give expression to America’s prayerful and continuing aspiration:

We pray that peoples of all faiths, all races, all nations, may have their great human needs satisfied; that those now denied opportunity shall come to enjoy it to the full; that all who yearn for freedom may experience its spiritual blessings; that those who have freedom will understand, also, its heavy responsibilities; that all who are insensitive to the needs of others will learn charity; that the scourges of poverty, disease and ignorance will be made to disappear from the earth, and that, in the goodness of time, all peoples will come to live together in a peace guaranteed by the binding force of mutual respect and love.

[BOLD FONT BY NANCY]