The Kingdom of Hawaii to create extraterrestrial visitor sanctuary


Discovery Channel Gobierrios Rusia y USA Confirman Vida Extraterrestre

Russian FlagRussian Flag

Although this video is in Russian, it is well worth watching to see the photography. Paul Hillyer, former Canadian Defense Minister, is featured. His contribution is in English. The second half of the video is about animals.


 Information regarding the Kingdom of Hawaii

“Welcome to the website of the Hawaiian Kingdom Government presently operating within the occupied State of the Hawaiian Islands. Since the Spanish-American War, 1898, our Nation has been under prolonged occupation by the United States of America. Our web pages tell you about the range of activities carried out by the Hawaiian Government in developing our relations with the community of Nations in regards to the occupation and the profound economic benefits that arise from its exposure. Click here to download the Strategic Plan of the acting Council of Regency (208KB PDF document).

The primary objective of the Hawaiian Kingdom Government is to expose the occupation of our nation within the framework of the 1907 Hague Conventions IV and V and our domestic statutes, and to provide a foundation for transition and the ultimate end of the occupation of the Hawaiian Kingdom. Article 43 of the 1907 Hague Convention IV mandates that the occupying government, being the United States of America, must administer the laws of the occupied State, being the Hawaiian Kingdom, and any deviation of this mandate is a violation of international law. Presently, the Hawaiian Islands reluctantly serves as the HQ’s for the largest of the nine unified military commands of the United States armed forces in the world, U.S. Pacific Command (USPACOM)”

“Hawaii was a recognized independent nation prior to January 17, 1893. On that day, the nation and government was illegally overthrown by the United States. Since illegal governments have assumed control over Hawaii under the direct guidance of the United States government. But, on March 13, 1999 the kanaka maoli people (Hawaiians) reinstated a government pro tempore and continue to implement steps in accordance to international law and the reinstated laws of the Hawaiian government to reclaim their sovereign independent status.”


Seal of the King - Hawaii



Putin puzzles others with his calm demeanor

I’d like to share an e-mail I sent to Geoffrey West tonight, following his newcast on Cosmic Vision News.

___________________ Putin - martial arts

Had to smile tonight as you reported on Putin. If people would look to esoteric astrology, they could know individuals much better. Below are excerpts from Putin’s chart:

Because both Putin’s 12th house cusp and his Saturn in the 12th house are both located on this 17th degree of Libra, I view this as a strong indication that a CALM MIND is a well developed skill brought in from prior lifetimes.

Vladimir Putin firmly believes that martial arts teach such knowledge, abilities and skills that every politician needs. Putin believes that judo trains both your body and your mind. It develops strength, reaction, endurance, teaches self-control, the ability to feel the moment, to see the opponent’s strengths and weaknesses, to strive for the best results and constantly work on improving oneself.

Putin has been practicing judo since he was 11 years old. “I was just a boy when I started judo. I became deeply interested in martial arts, their special philosophy, culture, relations with the opponent and the rules of combat,” says Putin, who holds the title of Master of Sports in judo. In September 2006 he became the honorary president of the European Judo Union, and in 2010 he received an honorary doctorate in judo from South Korea’s Yong In university.” [x]


I became a great fan of Putin’s while working on his chart. I agree that he and Obama are secretly working together.


Putin’s Pluto is located in the 10th house conjunct his Midheaven on the 22nd degree of Leo–a very strong placement.

The Sabian symbol for the 22nd degree of Leo: *A Carrier Pigeon Fulfilling Its Mission.*

Symbol’s Keynote: *Spirituality, in terms of training for service to mankind.*

Rudhyar’s Symbol Interpretation: “In contrast with the intoxicated chicken, we now have the successfully trained carrier pigeon delivering the message it was its function to carry. Here the domesticated bird is seen endowed with a special significance and purpose. This refers to spiritual energies which are being used constructively and which bring to the consciousness messages from other realms. Individual realizations acquire their true meaning only as they fulfill a collective function.”

Symbol’s Keyword: *WORLD SERVER – The ‘release’ of higher energies becomes effective and valuable to the extent to which it serves a higher, but concrete and definite, purpose. This is the ideal of the WORLD SERVER.*

The highest point of his natal chart–the Midheaven–declares Putin to be a WORLD SERVER.


And thus the confusion of others as they expect one thing of Putin and get a calm centeredness.

According to his former wife, Putin does not drink, never beat her (I understand most Russian men tend to do both) and absolutely adored his two daughters, paying much more attention to them than most Russian men do to their children.

Putin's daughtersPutin’s daughters – now grown

Heart Transplant childPutin with a 4 yr. old recent heart transplant patient

putin-hosted-a-lavish-tea-party-with-an-8-year-old-patient-of-the-rogachev-federal-research-and-clinical-center-of-pediatric-hematology-oncology-and-immunologyRussian President Vladimir Putin pours tea for Sonya, 8, a patient of the Rogachev Federal Research and Clinical Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology during her visit to the Kremlin.


Bottomline: he is a good man, even if some disagree with some of his decisions.

He can be gentle and play with little girls and be a World Server! Obama can do the same.










WOW!  WHAT A FANTASTIC NEWSCAST!–news-around-upon-within-and-beyond-our-planet







  “The Truth Embargo bases everything in fear. Look at the word UFO, Unidentified Flying Object. Every time a person encounters any new information regarding Extraterrestrials, they are reprogrammed again that we don’t know what these aerial vehicles are. We do know what they are and who is commanding them….”

“Extraterrestrials travel by the speed of magnetic light within a Zero Point atmosphere. A portion or faction within Humanity has had that technology in their hands for decades. The United States government, the President, theU.S. Military, the U.S. Intelligence Agencies and Private Contractors as well as their counter parts in many Countries have this knowledge. They all are motivated by greed to never tell the public that they fully well know who Admiral Sananda, Captain Ashtar and the trillions of Ships in the Galactic Federation are. They program the everyday man with notions about discovering new Planets which may support life, delivering fresh fruit to the ISS so their Astronauts won’t get rickets and locating yet another puddle of water on the surface of Mars. Indeed this faction has a fleet of International Space Stations which also travel by the speed of magnetic light, go into deep space, land and explore Planets like Ceres and Vesta and bring back payloads to these few who wish to control the many….”

“The Galactic Federation Ships cannot land on Earth to bring our technologies until Earth is a Planet of Peace. NESARA Law holds the provisions to do just this. Earth will return to Zero Point and no weapons can function within that vibration. Earth will instantly become a Planet of Peace as soon as the network of Zero Point technologies go to 100% function. Nuclear scientist, M.T. Keshe, has this role on Earth under my command….”

“Since Earth was created those from off Planet (Extra-Terrestrials) have visited Her. Currently there are fully functioning Galactic Federation Extraterrestrial Bases on Earth. ET lives under the Sea, inside Lakes, in Mountain portals and travel to Inner Earth through wormholes in the oceans and through the Poles. The programming of the dark Cabal of an ‘us vs. them’ mentality is the modis operandi of the Truth Embargo….”

“It is time now to join together as Galactic Citizens and do every thing within your power to bring these changes to Earth. The most important thing you can do is to pressure the Main Stream Media (MSM) to report on this issue. They are the greatest help to raising consciousness and spreading the Truth. Also the President, government and military witnesses need your support and forgiveness and compassion. Assist them in any way needed to bring the Truth through the channels of Congress. This will facilitate Full Galactic Disclosure. This is Key. MAKE IT YOUR MISSION! Salut.”

This is Ashtar through Elizabeth Trutwin, May 28, 2014 © All Rights Reserved.,,,,,

[Bold font by Nancy]


Gold and Economic Freedom, Alan Greenspan


Gold and Economic Freedom

Alan Greenspan

April 19, 1998

An almost hysterical antagonism toward the gold standard is one issue which unites statists of all persuasions. They seem to sense-perhaps more clearly and subtly than many consistent defenders of laissez-faire-that gold and economic freedom are inseparable, that the gold standard is an instrument of laissez-faire and that each implies and requires the other.

In order to understand the source of their antagonism, it is necessary first to understand the specific role of gold in a free society.

Money is the common denominator of all economic transactions. It is that commodity which serves as a medium of exchange, is universally acceptable to all participants in an exchange economy as payment for their goods or services, and can, therefore, be used as a standard of market value and as a store of value, i.e., as a means of saving.

The existence of such a commodity is a precondition of a division of labor economy. If men did not have some commodity of objective value which was generally acceptable as money, they would have to resort to primitive barter or be forced to live on self-sufficient farms and forgo the inestimable advantages of specialization. If men had no means to store value, i.e., to save, neither long-range planning nor exchange would be possible.

What medium of exchange will be acceptable to all participants in an economy is not determined arbitrarily. First, the medium of exchange should be durable. In a primitive society of meager wealth, wheat might be sufficiently durable to serve as a medium, since all exchanges would occur only during and immediately after the harvest, leaving no value-surplus to store. But where store-of-value considerations are important, as they are in richer, more civilized societies, the medium of exchange must be a durable commodity, usually a metal. A metal is generally chosen because it is homogeneous and divisible: every unit is the same as every other and it can be blended or formed in any quantity. Precious jewels, for example, are neither homogeneous nor divisible.

More important, the commodity chosen as a medium must be a luxury. Human desires for luxuries are unlimited and, therefore, luxury goods are always in demand and will always be acceptable. Wheat is a luxury in underfed civilizations, but not in a prosperous society. Cigarettes ordinarily would not serve as money, but they did in post-World War II Europe where they were considered a luxury. The term “luxury good” implies scarcity and high unit value. Having a high unit value, such a good is easily portable; for instance, an ounce of gold is worth a half-ton of pig iron.

In the early stages of a developing money economy, several media of exchange might be used, since a wide variety of commodities would fulfill the foregoing conditions. However, one of the commodities will gradually displace all others, by being more widely acceptable. Preferences on what to hold as a store of value, will shift to the most widely acceptable commodity, which, in turn, will make it still more acceptable. The shift is progressive until that commodity becomes the sole medium of exchange. The use of a single medium is highly advantageous for the same reasons that a money economy is superior to a barter economy: it makes exchanges possible on an incalculably wider scale.

Whether the single medium is gold, silver, sea shells, cattle, or tobacco is optional, depending on the context and development of a given economy. In fact, all have been employed, at various times, as media of exchange. Even in the present century, two major commodities, gold and silver, have been used as international media of exchange, with gold becoming the predominant one. Gold, having both artistic and functional uses and being relatively scarce, has always been considered a luxury good. It is durable, portable, homogeneous, divisible, and, therefore, has significant advantages over all other media of exchange. Since the beginning of World War I, it has been virtually the sole international standard of exchange.

If all goods and services were to be paid for in gold, large payments would be difficult to execute, and this would tend to limit the extent of a society’s division of labor and specialization. Thus a logical extension of the creation of a medium of exchange, is the development of a banking system and credit instruments (bank notes and deposits) which act as a substitute for, but are convertible into, gold.

$20 gold backed bill[Gold backed currency prior to Federal Reserve Notes]

[Added to article by Nancy]

A free banking system based on gold is able to extend credit and thus to create bank notes (currency) and deposits, according to the production requirements of the economy. Individual owners of gold are induced, by payments of interest, to deposit their gold in a bank (against which they can draw checks). But since it is rarely the case that all depositors want to withdraw all their gold at the same time, banker need keep only a fraction of his total deposits in gold as reserves. This enables the banker to loan out more than the amount of his gold deposits (which means that he holds claims to gold rather than gold as security for his deposits). But the amount of loans which he can afford to make is not arbitrary: he has to gauge it in relation to his reserves and to the status of his investments.

When banks loan money to finance productive and profitable endeavors, the loans are paid off rapidly and bank credit continues to be generally available. But when the business ventures financed by bank credit are less profitable and slow to pay off, bankers soon find that their loans outstanding are excessive relative to their gold reserves, and they begin to curtail new lending, usually by charging higher interest rates. This tends to restrict the financing of new ventures and requires the existing borrowers to improve their profitability before they can obtain credit for further expansion. Thus, under the gold standard, a free banking system stands as the protector of an economy’s stability and balanced growth.

When gold is accepted as the medium of exchange by most or all nations, an unhampered free international gold standard serves to foster a world-wide division of labor and the broadest international trade. Even though the units of exchange (the dollar, the pound, the franc, etc.) differ from country to country, when all are defined in terms of gold the economies of the different countries act as one–so long as there are no restraints on trade or on the movement of capital. Credit, interest rates, and prices tend to follow similar patterns in all countries. For example, if banks in one country extend credit too liberally, interest rates in that country will tend to fall, inducing depositors to shift their gold to higher-interest paying banks in other countries. This will immediately cause a shortage of bank reserves in the “easy money” country, inducing tighter credit standards and a return to competitively higher interest rates again.

A fully free banking system and fully consistent gold standard have not as yet been achieved. But prior to World War I, the banking system in the United States (and in most of the world) was based on gold, and even though governments intervened occasionally, banking was more free than controlled. Periodically, as a result of overly rapid credit expansion, banks became loaned up to the limit of their gold reserves, interest rates rose sharply, new credit was cut off, and the economy went into a sharp, but short-lived recession. (Compared with the depressions of 1920 and 1932, the pre-World War I business declines were mild indeed.) It was limited gold reserves that stopped the unbalanced expansions of business activity, before they could develop into the post- World War I type of disaster. The readjustment periods were short and the economies quickly reestablished a sound basis to resume expansion.

But the process of cure was misdiagnosed as the disease: if shortage of bank reserves was causing a business decline- argued economic interventionists-why not find a way of supplying increased reserves to the banks so they never need be short! If banks can continue to loan money indefinitely–it was claimed–there need never be any slumps in business. And so the Federal Reserve System was organized in 1913. It consisted of twelve regional Federal Reserve banks nominally owned by private bankers, but in fact government sponsored, controlled, and supported. Credit extended by these banks is in practice (though not legally) backed by the taxing power of the federal government. Technically, we remained on the gold standard; individuals were still free to own gold, and gold continued to be used as bank reserves. But now, in addition to gold, credit extended by the Federal Reserve banks (paper reserves) could serve as legal tender to pay depositors.

When business in the United States underwent a mild contraction in 1927, the Federal Reserve created more paper reserves in the hope of forestalling any possible bank reserve shortage. More disastrous, however, was the Federal Reserve’s attempt to assist Great Britain who had been losing gold to us because the Bank of England refused to allow interest rates to rise when market forces dictated (it was politically unpalatable). The reasoning of the authorities involved was as follows: if the Federal Reserve pumped excessive paper reserves into American banks, interest rates in the United States would fall to a level comparable with those in Great Britain; this would act to stop Britain’s gold loss and avoid the political embarrassment of having to raise interest rates.

The “Fed” succeeded: it stopped the gold loss, but it nearly destroyed the economies of the world, in the process. The excess credit which the Fed pumped into the economy spilled over into the stock market-triggering a fantastic speculative boom. Belatedly, Federal Reserve officials attempted to sop up the excess reserves and finally succeeded in braking the boom. But it was too late: by 1929 the speculative imbalances had become so overwhelming that the attempt precipitated a sharp retrenching and a consequent demoralizing of business confidence. As a result, the American economy collapsed. Great Britain fared even worse, and rather than absorb the full consequences of her previous folly, she abandoned the gold standard completely in 1931, tearing asunder what remained of the fabric of confidence and inducing a world-wide series of bank failures. The world economies plunged into the Great Depression of the 1930’s.

With a logic reminiscent of a generation earlier, statists argued that the gold standard was largely to blame for the credit debacle which led to the Great Depression. If the gold standard had not existed, they argued, Britain’s abandonment of gold payments in 1931 would not have caused the failure of banks all over the world. (The irony was that since 1913, we had been, not on a gold standard, but on what may be termed “a mixed gold standard”; yet it is gold that took the blame.)

But the opposition to the gold standard in any form-from a growing number of welfare-state advocates-was prompted by a much subtler insight: the realization that the gold standard is incompatible with chronic deficit spending (the hallmark of the welfare state). Stripped of its academic jargon, the welfare state is nothing more than a mechanism by which governments confiscate the wealth of the productive members of a society to support a wide variety of welfare schemes. A substantial part of the confiscation is effected by taxation. But the welfare statists were quick to recognize that if they wished to retain political power, the amount of taxation had to be limited and they had to resort to programs of massive deficit spending, i.e., they had to borrow money, by issuing government bonds, to finance welfare expenditures on a large scale.

Under a gold standard, the amount of credit that an economy can support is determined by the economy’s tangible assets, since every credit instrument is ultimately a claim on some tangible asset. But government bonds are not backed by tangible wealth, only by the government’s promise to pay out of future tax revenues, and cannot easily be absorbed by the financial markets. A large volume of new government bonds can be sold to the public only at progressively higher interest rates. Thus, government deficit spending under a gold standard is severely limited.

The abandonment of the gold standard made it possible for the welfare statists to use the banking system as a means to an unlimited expansion of credit. They have created paper reserves in the form of government bonds which-through a complex series of steps-the banks accept in place of tangible assets and treat as if they were an actual deposit, i.e., as the equivalent of what was formerly a deposit of gold. The holder of a government bond or of a bank deposit created by paper reserves believes that he has a valid claim on a real asset. But the fact is that there are now more claims outstanding than real assets.

The law of supply and demand is not to be conned. As the supply of money (of claims) increases relative to the supply of tangible assets in the economy, prices must eventually rise. Thus the earnings saved by the productive members of the society lose value in terms of goods. When the economy’s books are finally balanced, one finds that loss in value represents the goods purchased by the government for welfare or other purposes with the money proceeds of the government bonds financed by bank credit expansion.

In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation. There is no safe store of value. If there were, the government would have to make its holding illegal, as was done in the case of gold. If everyone decided, for example, to convert all his bank deposits to silver or copper or any other good, and thereafter declined to accept checks as payment for goods, bank deposits would lose their purchasing power and government-created bank credit would be worthless as a claim on goods. The financial policy of the welfare state requires that there be no way for the owners of wealth to protect themselves.

This is the shabby secret of the welfare statists’ tirades against gold. Deficit spending is simply a scheme for the “hidden” confiscation of wealth. Gold stands in the way of this insidious process. It stands as a protector of property rights. If one grasps this, one has no difficulty in understanding the statists’ antagonism toward the gold standard.

[Bold font by Nancy]

*   *   *   *   *   *   *

As reprinted from the book “Capitalism, the Unknown Ideal”

by Ayn Rand with additional articles by Alan Greenspan – 1967.


The Astrology of June 2014 – Relationship Shakeup

The Astrology of June 2014 – Relationship Shakeup

Carl BoudreauCarl Boudreau

“June’s chart indicates a major turning point for everyone that will change their worldview and ripple through all of their relationships, and on out into world at large.

The planets are putting us in touch with our deeper selves, stimulating us to live more authentically. We will strive to be more authentic ourselves and demand greater authenticity from others.”





Nancy, with Twin Flame, Uriel

  What Americans have been taught about our true history is next to nothing, especially regarding African Americans.

Maya Angelou’s death (May 28, 2014) brought back an intuitive knowing that has repeatedly nudged my mind recently. It happened again today as people all over the world stopped to remember Dr. Angelou and her contribution of wisdom to their lives through a wide variety of avenues. She did the superhuman, rising from a childhood of poverty and abuse to the greatness we are celebrating today.

I remember the death of Nelson Mandela in December 2013. He, too, had accomplished the superhuman. After serving 27 years in prison, “during which time he contracted tuberculosis and, as a black political prisoner, received the lowest level of treatment from prison workers. While incarcerated, Mandela was able to earn a Bachelor of Law degree through a University of London correspondence program.” After his release from prison, Mandela went on to become the first black president of South Africa.[i] Only a few months ago, the world stopped to celebrate Mandela’s contributions to their lives and our planet.

In 2008, America elected its first black president, or so we thought. The world stopped that night to celebrate the victory of Barack Obama. According to many who channel for Higher Beings, the American people actually elected Obama. Attempts to manipulate elections were stopped by our galactic family. In 2012, we got to witness on TV Karl Rove’s surprise that Obama was once more elected.

We thought we had elected our first black president because we do not know our true history. The internet has provided a pathway to learn much more actual history than we have been taught in our schools and universities.

Moorish history became available. “The majority of the world’s population has Moorish blood in them”: the skin color varies from light to blue black. Queen Philippa was England’s First Black Queen. The 21 gun salute originated with the Moors.[ii] I have read a channeled message by Elizabeth Trutwin that states the present Queen Elizabeth of England is a Moor.

At this point, it is still controversial, but it is possible that John Hansen, a Moor, was the first president following America’s adoption of the Articles of Confederation on March 1, 1781.

Once the signing took place in 1781, a President was needed to run the country. John Hanson was chosen unanimously by Congress (which included George Washington). In fact, all the other potential candidates refused to run against him, as he was a major player in the revolution and an extremely influential member of Congress.

As the first President, Hanson had quite the shoes to fill. No one had ever been President and the role was poorly defined. His actions in office would set precedent for all future Presidents. [iii]

He took office just as the Revolutionary War ended. Almost immediately, the troops demanded to be paid. As would be expected after any long war, there were no funds to meet the salaries. As a result, the soldiers threatened to overthrow the new government and put Washington on the throne as a monarch.

All the members of Congress ran for their lives, leaving Hanson as the only guy left running the government. He somehow managed to calm the troops down and hold the country together. If he had failed, the government would have fallen almost immediately and everyone would have been bowing to King Washington. In fact, Hanson sent 800 pounds of sterling silver by his brother Samuel Hanson to George Washington to provide the troops with shoes.

Hanson, as President, ordered all foreign troops off American soil, as well as the removal of all foreign flags. This was quite the feat, considering the fact that so many European countries had a stake in the United States since the days following Columbus.

Hanson established the Great Seal of the United States, which all Presidents have since been required to use on all official documents.

President Hanson also established the first Treasury Department, the first Secretary of War, and the first Foreign Affairs Department.

Lastly, he declared that the fourth Thursday of every November was to be Thanksgiving Day, which is still true today. 

The Articles of Confederation only allowed a President to serve a one year term during any three year period, so Hanson actually accomplished quite a bit in such little time.” [iv]

As we learn our true history, we are very likely to find that a black man was the first president following the adoption of the Articles of Confederation. Barack Obama is very likely the last president of the United States as we have known it. With disclosure of our galactic family’s presence with us, Earth humans are to create a galactic culture of love, peace, and abundance for all.

My intuitive sense is that we will soon discover Black History has been far grander than we have heretofore known!

Fascinating research for those interested!

NOTE BY NANCY:  Bold font was not intended … typed during an electrical storm and cannot change it.







%d bloggers like this: